Human Duplicity

Another Comparator of Nuclear MADness

2011-03-25T05:12:00.000-07:00

I have been attempting to find an easier way to understand this new disaster as it unfolds in Japan. As it was with the questionable and continuing realities of the Gulf Oil Spill (gusher), we are now faced with a larger uncertainty emanating from Japan.

To simplify our circumstances in layman’s terms, I will utilize the cold war scenario: Mutually Assured Destruction [MAD]. At the height of the cold war, the USA and the USSR were stockpiling Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles with nuclear-armed warheads. Some of these missiles contain clusters of multiple warheads that could be guided to hit strategic targets of an enemy’s infrastructure. The evident scenario of MADness was ultimately revealed when the probable victor was gauged by their fire power and how many times they could kill their enemy through a nuclear war.

This scenario has raised its ugly face once again with regard to the Fukushima Nuke disaster. However the same nagging questions remain: Is this yet one more man-made event to induce depopulation? Are these disastrous events evidence of prophecy being fulfilled, or are they merely the elite artificially fulfilling prophecy?

--------------------------------------------------

UPDATE No. 1 – “Number of Lethal Doses.”
San Francisco) – Physics Professor Paolo Scampa announced March 23, 2011 that the four destroyed reactors at Fukushima, Japan was about 70 Billion Lethal Doses, finely divided. Professor Scampa used only official IAEA data (International Atomic Energy Agency.)
According to the US Census Bureau there are approximately 6 Billion 907 Million people on Earth today. The wrecked General Electric nuclear reactors contained enough radioactive, highly poisonous fuel to kill every person on Earth about 10 times. The poison is in the atmosphere and spreading all over the world from Japan in 9 to 10 days.

Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/03/21/japan-the-solution-to-the-blown-reactors/

http://www.irsn.fr/FR/popup/Pages/irsn-meteo-france_19mars.aspx

Space Shuttle Challenger Remembered

2011-01-28T07:27:00.000-08:00

Some of the infamous events in history that we lived through, are forever imbibed in our memories. Even as we age and our short term memory degrades, horrific events such as the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster are still recalled like they happened yesterday. We had to accept NASA's official story of 'O-ring failures' as the cause which led to this tragedy. However, when the go-order was given to launch the shuttle in near freezing temperatures, it was already known that the O-ring seals were not rated to hold in temperatures below 40 degrees fahrenheit. Therefore, critical safety guidelines were intentionally bypassed. Why would NASA take such an immense risk during a high profile space mission? Either NASA management was totally incompetent, or they had covert reasons for seeking catostrophic failure. Regardless of which explanation NASA chooses, they will still appear bad, and they can never defend their actions in this matter.

By contrast, in decades past, we also had to accept the official stories regarding the assassinations of JFK, RFK & MLK, as well as the reasons for the Waco massacre in 1993, and the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. We were lied into perpetual wars using the false flag of 911, and then later blindsided with the bailouts of banks and Wall Street's ponzi schemes. In 2010, Martial Law was imposed on the U.S. Gulf Coast States to silence the truth regarding the growing number of victims resulting from the BP Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. This Godzilla of oil spills is the worst man-made disaster ever recorded, and it continues gushing oil, laced with toxic Corexit dispersants. These are just a few reflections of past events that I can remember off the top of my head, which have dubious historical accountability.

I will always have doubts in our governments "official" worded conclusions on anything, which should be expected with any written work of fiction that is submitted as fact. At this juncture in our timeline of world history, it seems rather useless to search for answers within the sea of lies and media disinformation. A conspiracy theorist will always have an uphill battle, because most people will accept baseless lies more easily than the evident truth.

For those of us who are old enough to remember, we shall always be able to recall where we were 25 years ago, on January 28, 1986 when the Challenger Space Shuttle went down in flames and a cloud of debris. The "official story" of why and how this space mission failed, will have to suffice as the historical record.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

-Franklin D. Roosevelt

2008-12-11T03:19:00.000-08:00

A Bastard’s Recourse to Locating and Opening Adoption Records

2008-12-09T06:06:00.000-08:00

Regardless of how an individual discovers that they were adopted – finding a hidden letter, revealing medical documents, or perhaps through a deathbed confession of a relative or parent – the truth eventually surfaces by one means or another. In many States, such as Pennsylvania, a Court will not allow the child to open their adoption records until both birth parents are deceased; however, the Court may permit the release of non-identifying family history information. What can make the task of opening adoption records more arduous or nearly impossible is when the adopted child cannot determine the hospital, facility, or location of their birth, let alone the Court that Finalized the Decree of Adoption. This blind and dubious search may often continue to only provide dead-ends and thousands of dollars in attorney costs to petition many County Courts in one or more States.

Throughout my 10 years of searching, sleuthing investigations, and enduring the discovery process through 2 years of Federal Court Litigation, I uncovered the basic facts, which may answer many adoptees’ questions regarding why they cannot find the location of their birth or the Court that finalized their adoption. Furthermore, an adoptee’s searches may never provide this sought-after information because there was never a Court Adoption Decree or Finalization and, therefore, there will not be a Court administration record for an Amended Birth Certificate that denotes the birth parents names. In other words, the child was never legally adopted through the protections of a State Court. As it is with any “Adoption Law” there are loop holes, which circumvent the Federal Laws and State Statute protections for illegitimate children, and these unlawful procedures are deemed to be substantiated for the monetary interests of lowering welfare costs to the State and/or the Federal Government.

Most of the public is well aware of the seedy tactics utilized by International Black Market Baby sales, or desperate parents selling their child on the Black Market… but there is yet another duplicitous professional method that is used by Hospitals, Doctors, and Attorneys, called “gray-market baby adoptions”. A “gray market baby adoption” implies that this method parallels a black market adoption, however, it is conducted through white-collar professionals whom unlawfully operate above the Law and in concert with State and Federal Authorities – this procedure has also been defined in case law as an “unadoption”. In most cases the Hospital works as the covert State Authorized Agency to broker babies of unwed mothers, to adoptive parents whom could not meet the State’s screening requirements to adopt a child otherwise. A hospital or doctor will have access to indexes of unwed expecting mothers, and selected attorneys will have an index of parents who want to adopt a child but the parents neither meet the State requirements nor have the monetary affluence to do so. This baby brokering method has been documented by Court Case Records to exist in the USA as far back as the 1920s in Florida:

http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/flsupct/70500/op-70500.pdf

Baby Brokering has also existed in several Counties in Pennsylvania, and most likely in many other States as well. However, even after many of these unlawful adoptions are discovered by the adoptee or his/her unwed birthmother, and challenged through a Civil Action, most of these Civil Litigations are quickly settled and the Court documents/records are permanently sealed. However, since my case was not handled through an attorney I have retained all my correspondences, Court Records, and Documents of Evidence.

All States have many illegitimate babies who need parents and there are many parents who wish to adopt them, but these States have such a high standard of screening requirements to adopt a child that many prospective parents are not State-eligible to adopt these orphans (e.g. low income, poor home environment, parent’s lack of education, both husband and wife work, etc.). It is contended that the State Department of Health turns its head and doesn’t enforce its own rules and laws that were intended to protect orphans because the unlawful brokering of illegitimate children removes the States’ financial burdens of housing, clothing, and feeding their growing orphan population, and also removes the expense of providing foster parent care for an illegitimate child. The State and Federal Authority’s blind posture is focused on ‘dollars and cents’ - not ‘common sense’. The Adoption Laws were created to protect the welfare of the illegitimate child; allowance for the unlawful brokering of illegitimate babies defeats the purpose for the creation of the State and Federal Laws which provide these protections.

In most States, an illegitimate birth registration is filed with the local County Registrar of births, and the Court administrates the Decree of Adoption. The adoption process is then finalized by the Court and it issues an Amended Birth Certificate when the adoptive parents take custody of the illegitimate child. But in the general procedure for a gray market adoption, an illegitimate child is not given the Court’s protection because the Hospital or facility where the child is born files a falsified birth registration that denotes the adoptive parent’s names and the amended name of their “unadopted” child. By filing a falsified birth registration in this manner, the lawful requirement for the Court’s Decree of Adoption and Finalization is bypassed as well as the requirement for the Court’s administration to amend the illegitimate child’s birth certificate. If an adoption is unlawfully administered in this manner, the Hospital that the child was born in will be the only accessible source of record for the adoption; however, the adoptees will need to know the name/location of the hospital that they were born in to pursue these medical/birth files.

Hospitals that broker gray market baby adoptions will generally create a secured embedded file that contains the birth mother’s records and her illegitimate child’s records, but the hospital will also create a “falsified” embedded maternity/birth file that denotes the adoptive mother’s name instead of the birth mother. However, the hospital will always need to keep all the birth records because the adoption was illegal and the Hospital is the Official Birth Registrar of the adoption - not the County/State. The hospital may also require these records in the event that their worst fear unexpectedly surfaces, because there will always be the possibility that any of the parties in a hospital-brokered gray market unadoption may reveal the truth… even 40 years after the illegitimate child’s birth. Please note that baby brokering is an unlawful act, whether it is conducted by an underground smuggling ring or a prominent hospital, and all whom were a party to this action could be criminally charged. This is the primary reason why these records are stored in a separate, secured hospital filing facility and these records are very hard to obtain without a Court Order.

The providers of gray market baby brokering do not consciously give any consideration regarding the family living environment that they are unlawfully placing an illegitimate child into. With gray market baby brokering there is neither screening of the parents to determine their financial and mental stability nor consideration of compatibility issues with other siblings who currently live in the prospective household. Whereas, a Court-administered adoption will provide protections to the illegitimate child through State-investigative screening of the parents and the environmental provisions of the household, which will determine if all the requirements for adopting the child are met. Inversely, the parent who receives a child through a gray market baby broker has no legal recourse in the event that this child has a genetically inherited physical or mental illness nor will the child have a valid medical history regarding their actual birth parents.

While I do denote the presumed logic of the State’s justice system with regard to gray market adoptions, I specifically needed to address the ramifications and legal obstacles from the perspective of an illegitimate child who discovers that he was unlawfully adopted. The means by which an individual’s “legal” adoption is discovered is comparatively similar, and opening their adoption Court Records is just a procedural formality. However, uncovering the truth and recovering records from an illegal and covert gray market adoption becomes a task requiring the individual to have a resilient attitude and relentless determination. The entire aspect of white collar crime, which has existed for decades and encompasses State Department Agencies, doctors, lawyers, multitudes of parents, and multi-million dollar hospital corporations with unlimited defense funds, becomes a giant can of worms in the eyes of the Federal Justice System. The second problem would be finding an attorney that will not fear the risk of losing his or her license to practice law by representing a case of this magnitude; or finding an attorney, who will accept the case, take your money, and sell-you-out in the process. My story started with a tumultuous childhood and my relative family’s cryptic clues, which led to the discovery of my adoption on my 38th birthday. With the help of a paralegal and a sympathetic librarian at the Library of Congress in D.C., I became familiar with the investigative methods of legal researching, overcoming the stonewalling tactics of a hospital records department, vehement intimidations from hospital defense attorneys, and enduring the Federal Court system through a precariously corrupt discovery process. I posted this article in layman’s terms in order to draw a preliminary path that will help similar “unadoptees” avoid the mistakes, hardships, and hurdles that I had to overcome throughout the four year litigation of my case.

I had the rare pleasure to consult with an attorney in Philadelphia who specialized in Tort Law (definition of tort litigation: Damage, injury, or a wrongful act done willfully, negligently, or in circumstances involving strict liability, but not involving breach of contract, for which a civil suit can be brought.). This attorney simply said, “I will be glad to accept your $3000 retainer, and charge you $300 per hour to take your case but why aren’t you doing this litigation by yourself; you don’t need an attorney”. This attorney was right because the only person you can trust in an endeavor of this magnitude is yourself. It is hoped that the thousands of adoptees’ in this circumstance will also realize this fact and pursue locating and opening their adoption records without the expense of an attorney… especially when you consider the task of litigation against white collar crime and gray-market baby brokering, which has been illegally conducted in the USA for approximately 100 years.

The Consequences of Human Free Will

2008-09-17T18:15:00.000-07:00

The Laws of Nature are regulated by balance; the Laws of Humanity are regulated by the conscience of free will, which by consequence interprets the imbalance of our World today.

I am not a scholar or religious activist; just a person who seeks the truth through observation of the past and present, evaluating and discerning both sides of the coin. You don't have to be a political or rocket scientist, economist, philosopher or theologian to see through the fog of deception. One only has to look at the Laws of Nature verses Laws of Humanity for the answer.

The Laws of Nature provide a good balance of life that allows for predominance and survival of the fittest over the weakest, thus strengthening all species through natural selection/elimination. Laws of Nature are perceived as evil according to the Laws of Humanity because the human’s laws do not permit unauthorized killing and allows for predominance by a caste system of privilege, based on wealth or knowledge. Laws of Humanity can provide good intention with liberal compassion which allows the weak to live at the expense of the fittest and at the same time can commit evil acts of genocide or ethnic cleansing that slaughters millions of innocent people. The Laws of Nature provide a good balance between extinction and substance for survival; the Laws of Humanity provide an artificial balance between the right to kill and the right to live.

So in closing, I wish to point out that the true issue that confronts the future of Humankind is not a circumstance with containing and sustaining biological matter; it is the spiritual consequence of individual Human conscience in the arena of 'good' verses 'evil'. However, even if the intellect of humankind can evolve to this point of realization, they will still be trapped in a dilemma because even though the deeds of 'good' and 'evil' are opposites, reality and circumstance are the factors that will define what is right and wrong in the eyes of the beholder.

Such is life on Planet Earth, and the consequences of Human free will.